Subversion Repositories svnkaklik

\chap Trial design

The whole design of radioastronomy receiver digitalization unit is constructed to be used in a wide range of applications and tasks related to digitalization of signal from radioastronomy receivers. A good illustrating problem for its use is a signal digitalisation from multiple antenna arrays. This design will eventually become a part of MLAB Advanced Radio Astronomy System. 

\sec Required parameters

Wide dynamical range and high IP3 are desired. The receiver must accept wide dynamic signals because a typical radioastronomical signal has a form of a weak signal covered by a strong man-made noise.    

Summary of main required parameters follows 

\begitems

  * Dynamical range better than 80 dB

  * Phase stability between channels 

  * Noise (all types)

  * Sampling jitter better than 100 metres

  * Support for any number of receivers in range 1 to 8

\enditems

\sec Sampling frequency

Sampling frequency is limited by the technical constrains in the trial design. This parameter is especially limited by the sampling frequencies of analog-to-digital conversion chips available on the market and interface bandwidth. Combination of the required parameters -- dynamic range requiring at least 16bit and a minimum sampling frequency of 1$\ $MSPS leads to need of high end ADC chips which does not support such low sampling frequencies at all. Their minimum sampling frequency is 5$\ $MSPS.

We calculate minimum data bandwidth data rate for eight receivers, 2 bytes per sample and 5$\ $MSPS as $8 \cdot 2 \cdot 5\cdot 10^6 = 80\ $MB/s. Such data rate is at the limit of real writing speed o classical HDD and it is almost double of real bandwidth of USB 2.0 interface. 

\sec System scalability

For analogue channels scalability, special parameters of ADC modules are required. Ideally, there should be a separate output for each analogue channel in ADC module. ADC module must also have separate outputs for frames and data output clocks. These parameters allow for conduction at relatively low digital data rates. As a result, the digital signal can be conducted even through long wires. 

Clock signal will be handled distinctively in our scalable design. Selected ADC chip are guaranteed to have defined clock skew between sampling and data output clock. This allows taking data and frame clocks from the first ADC module only. The rest of the data and frame clocks from other ADC modules can be measured for diagnostic purposes (failure detection, jitter measurement etc.). If more robustness is required from designs DCO and FR signal may be collected from other modules and routed through an voting logic which will correct possible signal defects.  

This system concept allows for scalability, that is technically limited by a number of differential signals on host side and its computational power.  There is another advantage of scalable data acquisition system -- an economic one. Observatories or end users can make a choice of how much money are they willing to spent on radioastronomy receiver system. This freedom of choice is especially useful for science sites without previous experience in radioastronomy observations.     

\secc Differential signaling 

The concept of scalable design requires relatively long circuit traces between ADC and digital unit which captures the data and performs the computations. The long distance between the digital processing unit and the analog-to-digital conversion unit has an advantage in noise retention typically produced by digital circuits. Those digital circuits, such as FPGA or other flip-flops block and circuit traces, usually work at high frequencies and emit wide-band noise with relatively low power. In such cases any increase in a distance between the noise source and analog signal source increase S/N significantly. However, at the same time a long distance brings problems with the digital signal transmission between ADC and computational unit. This obstacle should be resolved more easily in free-space than on board routing. The high-quality differential signalling shielded cables should be used. This technology has two advantages over PCB signal routing. First, it can use twisted pair of wires for leak inductance suppression in signal path and second, the twisted pair may additionally be shielded by uninterrupted metal foil.              

\secc Phase matching

For multiple antenna radioastronomy projects, system phase stability is a mandatory condition. It allows precise high resolution imaging of objects. 

High phase stability in our scalable design is achieved through centralized frequency generation  and distribution with multi-output LVPECL hubs, that have equiphased outputs for multiple devices. LVPECL logic is used on every system critical clock signal distribution hub. LVPECL logic has advantage over LVDS in signal integrity robustness. LVPECL uses higher logical levels and higher signalling currents. Consumption currents of LVPECL logic are near constant over operating frequency range due to use of bipolar transistor this minimises voltage glitches which are typical for CMOS logic. One drawbacks of that parameters is high power consumption of LVPECL logic. 

This design ensures that all devices have access to the defined phase and known frequency.     

\sec System description

In this section testing system will be described.

\secc Frequency synthesis       

We have used a centralized topology as a basis for frequency synthesis. One precise high-frequency and low-jitter digital oscillator has been used \cite[MLAB-GPSDO], while other working frequencies have been derived from it by the division of its signal. This central oscillator has a software defined GPS disciplined control loop for frequency stabilization.\fnote{SDGPSDO design has been developed in parallel to this diploma thesis as a related project, but it is not explicitly required by the diploma thesis.}

We have used methods of frequency monitoring compensation in order to meet modern requirements on radioastronomy equipment which needs precise frequency and phase stability over a wide scale for effective radioastronomy imaging. 

GPSDO device consists the Si570 chip with LVPECL output. Phase jitter of GPSDO is determined mainly by Si570 phase noise. Parameters of used Si570 from source \cite[si570-chip] are summarized in table \ref[LO-noise].

\midinsert \clabel[LO-noise]{Available ADC types}

\ctable{lcc}{

	&	 \multispan2 \hfil Phase Noise [dBc/Hz] \hfil 		\cr

Offset Frequency	&	$F_{out}$ 156.25 MHz	& $F_{out}$ 622.08 MHz \cr

100 [Hz]	&	–105	&	–97 \cr

1 [kHz]	&	–122	&	–107 \cr

10 [kHz]	&	–128	&	–116 \cr

100 [kHz]	&	–135	&	–121 \cr

1 [MHz]	&	–144	&	–134 \cr

10 [MHz]	&	–147	&	–146 \cr

100 [MHz]	&	n/a	&	–148 \cr

}

\caption/t The summary of available ADC types and theirs characteristics. 

\endinsert

Every ADC module will be directly connected to CLKHUB02A module which takes sampling clock signal delivered by FPGA from main local oscillator.  This signal should use high quality differential signaling cable -- we should use SATA cable for this purpose. FPGA may slightly affect clock signal quality by additive noise, but has negligible effect in application where developed system will be used.

GPSDO design included in data acquisition system has special feature -- generates time marks for precise time-stamping of received signal. Timestamps are created by disabling of local oscillator for 100 us as result rectangle click in input signal is created which appears as horizontal line in spectrogram.   

Timestamps should be seen in image \ref[meteor-reflection] (above and below meteor reflection).

Time-marking should be improved in future by digitalization  of GPS signal received by antenna on observational station. GPS signal can be then directly sampled by dedicated receiver an separate ADC module. Datafile then consists samples from channels of radio-astronomy receivers along with GPS signal containing precise time information. 

\secc Signal cable connectors 

Several widely used and commercially easily accessible differential connectors were considered to be use in our design. 

\begitems

* HDMI % [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hdmi|HDMI]]</del>

* SATA  		%{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_attached_SCSI#Connectors|SAS]]/[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA|SATA]]

* DisplayPort 		%[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_port|DisplayPort]]</del>

* SAS/miniSAS

\enditems

At the end, MiniSAS connector was chosen as the best option to be used in connecting together multiple ADC modules. It is compatible with existing SATA cabling systems and aggregates multiple SATA cables to a single connector. It can be seen on the following picture \ref[img-miniSAS-cable]. A transition between SATA and miniSAS is achieved by SAS to SATA adapter cable which is commonly used in servers to connect SAS controller to multiple SATA hard disc in RAID systems and thus is commercially easily available. 

The main drawback of miniSAS PCB connectors lies in the fact, that they are manufactured in SMT versions only. The outer metal housing of connector is designed to be mounted using a standard through-hole mounting scheme, a design that unfortunately decreases the durability of the connector. 

\midinsert

\clabel[img-miniSAS-cable]{Used miniSAS cable}

\picw=5cm \cinspic ./img/miniSAS_SATA_cable.jpg

\caption/f An example of miniSAS cable similar to used.

\endinsert

\secc Signal integrity requirements

\label[diff-signaling]

We use ADC modules that have DATA clock frequency eight times higher than sampling frequency in single line output mode, implying a 40 MHz output bit rate. This imply $ 1/4 \cdot 10^7 = 25\ $ns time length of data bit, which is equivalent to 7.5m light path in free space. If we use copper PCB with FR4 substrate layer or coaxial/twinax cable, we could obtain velocity factor of 0.66 at worst condition. Then the light path for the same bit rate $t_s$ will be 4.95 m. Although we do not have any cables in system with comparable lengths, worst data bit skew described by data sheets of used components is $0.3 \cdot t_s$, which is 1.485 m. Therefore length matching is not critical in our current design operated on lowest sampling speed. Length matching becomes critical in future version with higher sampling rates, then cable length must be matched. However SATA cabling technology is prepared for that case and matched SATA cables are standard merchandise. 

\secc ADC modules design

\midinsert

\picw=10cm \cinspic ./img/ADCdual_Top.png

\picw=10cm \cinspic ./img/ADCdual_Bottom.png

\caption/f FPGA ML605 development board.

\endinsert

\secc ADC selection

There exist several ADC signaling formats currently used in communication with FPGA. 

\begitems

  * DDR LVDS

  * JEDEC 204B

  * JESD204A

  * Paralel LVDS

  * Serdes

  * serial LVDS

\enditems

Because it uses the smallest number of differential pairs, the choice fell on the serial LVDS format. Small number of differential pairs is an important parameter determining the construction complexity and reliability\cite[serial-lvds]. 

An ultrasound AFE chip seems to be ideal for this purpose -- the chip has integrated both front-end amplifiers and filters. It has a drawback though - it is incapable of handling differential input signal and has a relatively low dynamic range (as it consists only of 12bit ADC). Because this IO has many ADC channels the scaling is possible only by a factor of 4 receivers (making 8 analogue channels).

If we require a separate output for every analogue channel and a 16bit depth we find that there are only a few 2-Channel simultaneous sampling ADCs currently existing which meet these requirements.  We have summarized the ADCs in the following table \ref[ADC-type] 

\midinsert \clabel[ADC-types]{Available ADC types}

\ctable{lccccccc}{

\hfil ADC Type & LTC2271 & LTC2190 & LTC2191 & LTC2192 & LTC2193 & LTC2194 & LTC2195 \cr

SNR [dB] & 84.1 & 77 & 77 & 77 & 76.8 & 76.8 & 76.8 \cr

SFDR [dB] & 99 & 90 & 90 & 90 & 90 & 90 & 90 \cr

S/H Bandwidth [MHz] & 200 & \multispan6 550 \cr

Sampling rate [MSPS] & 20 & 25 & 40 & 65 & 80 &  105 & 125 \cr

Configuration & \multispan7 SPI \cr

Package & \multispan7 52-Lead (7mm $\times$ 8mm) QFN \cr

}

\caption/t The summary of available ADC types and theirs characteristics. 

\endinsert

All parts in this category are compatible with one board layout. Main differences lay in the sampling frequency and signal to noise ratio, with the slowest having a maximum sampling frequency of 20 MHz. However all of them have a minimal sampling frequency of 5 MSPS and all are configurable over a serial interface (SPI). SPI seems to be a standard interface used in high-end ADC chips made by the largest manufacturers (Analog Devices, Linear technology, Texas instruments, Maxim integrated..). 

The ADC modules have a standard MLAB construction scheme with four mounting holes in corners aligned in defined raster. 

Data serial data outputs of ADC modules should be connected directly to FPGAs for the basic primary signal processing. The ADC chip used in the modules has a selectable bit width of data output bus and thus the output SATA connectors have signals arranged to contain a single bit from every ADC channel.  This creates a signal concept enabling a selection of a proper bus bit-width according to the sampling rate (higher bus bit-width downgrades signalling speed and vice versa.)

In order to connect the above mentioned signalling layout, miniSAS to multiple SATA cable should be used.  

A KiCAD design suite had been chosen for PCB layout. However, the version is, despite having integrated CERN Push \& Shove routing capability, slightly unstable as it sometimes crushes due to an exception during routing. On the basis of these stability issues, the design had to be saved quite often. On the other hand, compared to commercially available solutions, such as MentorGraphics PADS or Cadence Orcad,  the Open-source KiCAD provides an acceptable option and it easily surpasses a widely used Eagle software.

As a part of work on the thesis, new PCB footprints for FMC, SATA a and miniSAS connectors have been designed and were committed to KiCAD github library repository. They are now publicly available on the official KiCAD repository at GitHub.  

ADCdual01A module has several digital data output formats. Difference between these modes lays in the number of differential pairs used

\begitems

    * 1-lane mode

    * 2-lane mode

    * 4-lane mode

\enditems

All of the above-mentioned modes are supported by the module design. For the discussed data acquisition system, the 1-lane mode was selected. 1-lane mode allows a minimal number of differential pairs between ADCdual01A and FPGA. Digital signalling scheme used in 1-lane mode is shown in the following image \ref[1-line-out]. 

\midinsert

\clabel[1-line-out]{Single line ADC output signals}

\picw=15cm \cinspic ./img/ADC_single_line_output.png

\caption/f Digital signalling schema for 1-line ADC digital output mode.

\endinsert

ADCdual01A parameters can be set either by jumper setup (referred to as a parallel programming  in the device's data sheet) or by SPI interface. SPI interface has been selected for our system, because of the parallel programming lack of options (test pattern output setup for example). 

Complete schematic diagram of ADCdual01A module board is included in the appendix. 

\secc ADC modules interface

\midinsert

\picw=10cm \cinspic ./img/FMC2DIFF_top.png

\picw=10cm \cinspic ./img/FMC2DIFF_Bottom.png

\caption/f FPGA ML605 development board.

\endinsert

Both of the ADCdual01A modules were connected to FPGA ML605 board trough FMC2DIFF01A adapter board. The design of this adapter module expects the presence of FMC LPC connector and the board is, at the same time, not compatible with MLAB. It is, on the other hand, designed to meet the VITA 57 standard specifications for boards which support region 1 and region 3. VITA 57 regions are explained in the picture \ref[VITA57-regions].

This industry standard guarantees the compatibility with other FPGA boards that have FMC LPC connectors for Mezzanine Card. Schematic diagram of designed adapter board is included in the appendix. 

The primary purpose of the PCB is to enable the connection of ADC modules located outside the PC case. (In PC box analog circuits cannot be realized without the use of massive RFI mitigation techniques). 

Differential signaling connectors should be used for conducting digital signal over relatively long cables. The signal integrity sensitive links (clocks) are equipped with output driver and translator to LVPECL logic for better signal transmission quality.  

LVPECL level signal connectors on FMC2DIFF01A board are dedicated for clock signals. We selected  the SY55855V and SY55857L dual translators. Dual configuration in useful due to fact that SATA cable contains two differential pairs. 

The SY55855V is a fully differential, CML/PECL/LVPECL-to-LVDS translator. It achieves LVDS signaling up to 1.5Gbps, depending on the distance and the characteristics of the media and noise coupling sources.

LVDS is intended to drive 50 $\Omega$ impedance transmission

line media such as PCB traces, backplanes, or cables. SY55855V inputs can be terminated with a single resistor between the true and the complement pins of a given input \cite[SY55855V-chip].

The SY55857L is a fully differential, high-speed dual translator optimized to accept any logic standard from single-ended TTL/CMOS to differential LVDS, HSTL, or CML and translate it to LVPECL. Translation is guaranteed for speeds up to 2.5Gbps (2.5GHz toggle frequency). The SY55857L does not internally terminate its inputs, as different interfacing standards have different termination requirements.

\midinsert

\picw=10cm \cinspic ./img/ML605-board.jpg

\caption/f FPGA ML605 development board.

\endinsert

\midinsert

\clabel[VITA57-regions]{VITA57 board geometry}

\picw=10cm \cinspic ./img/VITA57_regions.png

\caption/f Definition of VITA57 regions.

\endinsert

Several SATA connectors and two miniSAS connectors are populated on this board.  This set of connectors allows a connection of any number of ADC modules within the range of 1 to 8. ADC data outputs should be connected to the miniSAS connectors, while other supporting signals should be routed directly to SATA connectors on adapter. 

Lengths of differential pairs routed on PCB of the module are not matched between the pairs. Length variation of differential pairs is not critical in our design according to facts discussed in paragraph \ref[diff-signaling]. Nevertheless, signals within differential pairs themselves are matched for length. Internal signal tracing of the length matchting of differential pairs is mandatory in order to avoid a dynamic logic hazard conditions on digital signals. Thus clocks' signals are routed in the most precise way on all designed boards.

Signal configuration used in our trial design is described in the following tables. 

%% zapojeni SPI, FPGA zpatky necte konfiguraci, ale je tam na slepo nahravana.

\midinsert \clabel[minisas-interface]{Grabber binary output format}

\ctable {cccc}

{

miniSAS	&	SATA pair	&	FMC signal	&	Used as	\cr

P0	&	1	&	LA03	&	 not used 	\cr

P0	&	2	&	LA04	&	 not used 	\cr

P1	&	1	&	LA08	&	 not used 	\cr

P1	&	2	&	LA07	&	 not used 	\cr

P2	&	1	&	LA16	&	ADC1  CH1 (LTC2190)	\cr

P2	&	2	&	LA11	&	ADC1  CH2 (LTC2190) 	\cr

P3	&	1	&	LA17	&	ADC2 CH1 (LTC2271)	\cr

P3	&	2	&	LA15	&	ADC2 CH2 (LTC2271)	\cr

}

\caption/t miniSAS (FMC2DIFF01A J7) signal connections between modules. 

\endinsert

SPI interface is used in an unusual way in this design. SPI Data outputs from ADCs are not connected anywhere and read back is not possible, thus the configuration written to registers in ADC module cannot be validated. We have not observed any problems with this system, but it may be a possible source of failures. 

\midinsert \clabel[SPI-system]{Grabber binary output format}

\ctable {ccc}

{

SPI connection J7	&	FMC signal	&	Connected to	\cr

SAS-AUX1	 &	LA14\_N	&	SPI DOUT	\cr

SAS-AUX2	 &	LA14\_P	&	SPI CLK	\cr

SAS-AUX3	 &	LA12\_N	&	CE ADC1	\cr

SAS-AUX4	 &	LA12\_P	&	CE ADC2	\cr

SAS-AUX5	 &	LA13\_N	&	soldered to GND	\cr

SAS-AUX6	 &	LA13\_P	&	not used	\cr

SAS-AUX7	 &	LA09\_N	&	not used	\cr

SAS-AUX8	 &	LA09\_P	&	soldered to GND	\cr

}

\caption/t SPI system interconnections 

\endinsert

\midinsert \clabel[clock-interconnections]{Grabber binary output format}

\ctable {lccc}

{

Signal	&	FMC signal	&	FMC2DIFF01A	&	ADCdual01A	\cr

DCO	&	CLK1\_M2C	&	J5-1	&	J13-1	\cr

FR	&	LA18\_CC	&	J10-1	&	J12-1	\cr

ENC	&	LA01\_CC	&	J2-1(PECL OUT)	&	J3-1	\cr

SDGPSDO01A LO	&	CLK0\_M2C	&	J3-1 (PECL IN)	&	N/A	\cr

}

\caption/t Clock system interconnections 

\endinsert

\secc FPGA function 

Several tasks in our design are performed by FPGA. Firstly, FPGA prepares a sampling clock for ADCdual01A modules this task is separate block in FPGA and runs asynchronously compared to other logical circuits. The second block is a SPI configuration module, which sends the content of configuration registers to the ADC modules after opening of Xillybus interface file. The third block represents the main module which resolves ADC - PC communication itself. The last block is activated after ADC configuration. 

Communication over PCIe is managed by proprietary IP Core and Xillybus driver, which transfers data from FPGA registers to host PC. Data appear in system device file named  "/dev/xillybus_data2_r" on the host computer. Binary data which appear in this file after its opening are described in the table below \ref[xillybus-interface].

\midinsert \clabel[xillybus-interface]{Grabber binary output format}

\ctable {clllllllll}{

\hfil & \multispan9 \hfil 160bit packet \hfil \crl \tskip4pt

Data name &  FRAME  & \multispan2 \hfil ADC1 CH1 \hfil & \multispan2 \hfil ADC1 CH2 \hfil & \multispan2  \hfil ADC2 CH1 \hfil & \multispan2 \hfil ADC2 CH2 \hfil  \cr

Data type & uint32 & int16 & int16 & int16 & int16 & int16 & int16 & int16 & int16 \cr

Content & saw signal & $t1$ &  $t_{1+1}$ &  $t1$ &  $t_{1+1}$ &  $t1$ &  $t_{1+1}$ &  $t1$ &  $t_{1+1}$ \cr

}

\caption/t System device "/dev/xillybus_data2_r" data format

\endinsert

Detailed description of FPGA function can be found in \cite[fpga-middleware]

\secc Data reading and recording 

In order to read the data stream from the ADC drive, we use Gnuradio software. Gnuradio suite consists of gnuradio-companion which is a graphical tool for creating signal-flow graphs and generating flow-graph source code. This tool was used to create a basic RAW data grabber to record and interactively view the data stream output from ADC modules. 

\midinsert

\picw=15cm \cinspic ./img/screenshots/Grabber.grc.png

\caption/f An ADC recorder flow graph created in gnuradio-companion.

\endinsert

\midinsert

\picw=15cm \cinspic ./img/screenshots/Grabber_running.png

\caption/f User interface window of a running ADC grabber.

\endinsert

The interactive grabber-viewer user interface shows live oscilloscope-like time-value display for all data channels and live time-frequency scrolling display (a waterfall view) for displaying the frequency components of the grabbed signal. 

\sec Achieved parameters

\secc ADC module parameters

Two prototypes of ADC modules were assembled and tested. The first prototype, labeled ADC1, has LTC2190 ADC chip populated with LT6600-5 front-end operational amplifier. It also has a 1kOhm resistors populated on inputs which give it an ability of an internal attenuation of the input signal. The value of this attenuation $A$ is described by the following formula \ref[ADC1-gain]

\label[ADC1-gain]

$$

A = {806 \cdot R_1 \over R_1 + R_2}

$$

Where the letters stand for: 

\begitems

  * $A$ -  Gain of an input amplifier.

  * $R_1$ - Output impedance of signal source (usually 50 Ohm).

  * $R_2$ - Value of serial resistors at operational amplifier inputs.

\enditems

We have $R_2 = 1000 \Omega$ and $R_1 = 50 \Omega$ which imply that $A = 0.815$. That value of A is further confirmed by the measurement. 

In our measurement setup we have H1012 Ethernet transformer connected to inputs of ADC. The transformer has a 10\% tolerance in impedance and amplification. We measured ADC saturation voltage of 705.7 mV (generator output) in this setup due to impedance mismatch and uncalibrated transformer gain. 

\midinsert

\clabel[ADC1-FFT]{ADC1 sine test FFT}

\picw=15cm \cinspic ./img/screenshots/ADC1_CH2_FFT.png

\caption/f Sine signal sampled by ADC1 module with LTC2190 and LT6600-5 devices.

\endinsert

For ADC2 we have to use formula with a different constant \ref[ADC1-gain]. The ADC2 module has LT6600-2.5 amplifiers populated on it with gain equal to $A = 2.457$ and uses the same $R_2$ resistors. We measured saturation voltage of 380 mV (generator output) at channel 1 on this ADC. It is well in parameter tolerances  of used setup.   

\label[ADC2-gain]

$$

A = {1580 \cdot R_1 \over R_1 + R_2}

$$

Where the letters stand for:

\begitems

  * $A$ -  Gain of an input amplifier.

  * $R_1$ - Output impedance of signal source (usually 50 Ohm).

  * $R_2$ - Value of serial resistors at operational amplifier inputs.

\enditems

\midinsert

\clabel[ADC2-FFT]{ADC2 sine test FFT}

\picw=15cm \cinspic ./img/screenshots/ADC2_CH1_FFT.png

\caption/f Sine signal sampled by ADC2 module with LTC2271 and LT6600-2.5 devices.

\endinsert

Computed FFT spectra for measured signal are shown in the images \ref[ADC2-FFT] and \ref[ADC1-FFT].  Both images confirm that ADCdual01A modules have input dynamical range of 80 dB at least. 

\chap Example of usage

For additional validation of system characteristics a receiver setup has been constructed. 

\sec Basic interferometric station

Interferometry station was chosen to serve as the most basic experimental setup. We connected the new data acquisition system to two SDRX01B receivers. Block schematics of the setup used is shown in image \ref[block-schematic]. Two ground-plane antennae were used and mounted outside the balcony at CTU building at location 50$^\circ$ 4\' 36.102\" N,  14$^\circ$ 25\' 4.170\" E. 

Antennae were equipped  by LNA01A amplifiers. All coaxial cables have the same length of 5 meters. Antennae were isolated by common mode ferrite bead mounted on cable to minimise the signal coupling between antennas. Evaluation system consists of SDGPSDO local oscillator subsystem used to tune the local oscillator frequency. 

\midinsert

\clabel[block-schematic]{Receiver block schematic}

\picw=10cm \cinspic ./img/Coherent_UHF_SDR_receiver.png

\caption/f Complete receiver block schematic of dual antenna interferometric station.

\endinsert

% doplnit schema skutecne pouziteho systemu

Despite of schematic diagram proposed on beginning of system description.... 

We used two separate oscillators -- one oscillator drives encode signal to ADCs still through FPGA based divider and other one drives SDRX01B mixer. 

Reason for this modification is simplification of frequency tuning during experiment. It is because single oscillator may be used only with proper setting of FPGA divider, this divider may be modified only by recompilation of FPGA code and loading/flashing new FPGA schema. Due to fact that FPGA was connected to PCI express and kernel drivers and hardware must be reinitialized, reboot of PC is required.  Instead of this procedure, we set the FPGA divider to constant division of factor 30 and used another district oscillator for ADCdual01 sampling modules and for SDRX01B receiver. 

\midinsert

\clabel[meteor-reflection]{Meteor reflection}

\picw=10cm \cinspic ./img/screenshots/observed_meteor.png

\caption/f Meteor reflection received by evaluation setup.

\endinsert

\midinsert

\clabel[phase-difference]{Phase difference}

\picw=10cm \cinspic ./img/screenshots/phase_difference.png

\caption/f Demonstration of phase difference between antennas.

\endinsert

For simplest demonstration of phase difference between antennas, we analyse part of signal by complex conjugate multiplication between channels. Result of this analysis can be seen on picture \ref[phase-difference]. Points of selected part of signal creates clear vector, which illustrates the presence of phase difference. 

We use ACOUNT02A device for frequency checking on both local oscillators. 

%\sec Simple passive Doppler radar

%\sec Simple polarimeter station

\chap Proposed final system

Construction of a final system which is supposed to be employed for real radioastronomy observations will be described. This chapter is mainly a theoretical analysis of data handling systems. Realization of these ideas might be possible as a part of our future development after we fully evaluate and test the current trial design. 

The system requires proper handling of huge amounts of data and either huge and fast storage capacity is needed for store captured signal data, or enormous computational power is required for online data processing and filtering. Several hardware approach currently exist and are in use for data processing problem handling. Either powerful multi gigahertz CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, or specially  constructed ASICs are used for this task.

\sec Custom design of FPGA board

In the beginning of the project, a custom design of FPGA interface board had been considered. This FPGA board should include PCI express interface and should sell at lower price than trial design. It should be compatible with MLAB which is further backward compatible with the existing or improved design of ADC modules. For a connection of FPGA board to another adapter board with PCIe we expect a use of a PCIe host interface. 

Thunderbolt technology standard was expected to be used in this PC to PCIe module which further communicate with MLAB compatible FPGA module. Thunderbolt chips are currently available on the market for reasonable prices \cite[thunderbolt-chips]. However, a problem lies in the accessibility to their specifications, as specification is only available for licensed users and Intel has a mass market oriented licensing policy, that makes this technology inaccessible for low quantity production. As a consequence, an external PCI Express cabling and expansion slots should be considered as a better solution, if we need preserve standard PC as main computational platform.

However, these PCI express external systems and cables are still very expensive. Take Opal Kelly XEM6110 \cite[fpga-pcie] as an example, with its price tag reaching 995 USD at time of writing of thesis.

Therefore, a better solution probably needs to be found.

An interfacing problem will by  probably resolved by other than Intel ix86 architecture. Many ARM computers have risen on market due to increased demand of embedded technologies, which requires high computation capacity, low power consumption and small size -- especially smart phones. Many of those ARM based systems has interesting parameters for signal processing. This facts makes Intel's ix86 architecture unattractive for future project. 

\sec Parralella board computer

Parallella is new product from Adapteva, Inc. \cite[parallella-board], this small supercomputer have been in development almost two years and only testing series of boards have been produced until now (first single-board computers with 16-core Epiphany chip were shipped December 2013) \cite[parallella-board]. This board have near ideal parameters for signal processing (provides around 50 GFLOPS of computational power). The board is equipped by Epiphany coprocessor which has 16 High Performance RISC CPU Cores,  Zynq-7020 FPGA with Dual ARM® Cortex™-A9 MPCore™ and 866 MHz operating frequency, 1GB RAM,  85K Logic Cells, 10/100/1000 Ethernet and OpenCL support \cite[parallella16-board]. Completely  this board provides  In addition of that this board consume only 3 Watts of power if both Zynq and Epiphany cores are running.     

Main disadvantage of Parralella board is is unknown lead time and absence of SATA interface or other interface for data storage connection. Fast data storage interface would be useful and allows bulk processing of captured data. Then a result from data processing will be sent over the Ethernet interface to data storage server.

\midinsert

\clabel[img-parallella-board]{Parallella board overview}

\picw=15cm \cinspic ./img/ParallellaTopView31.png

\caption/f Top view on Parallella-16 board \cite[parallella16-board].

\endinsert

If Parallella board will be used as radioastronomy data interface a new ADC interface module should be designed. Interfacing module will use four PEC connectors mounted on bottom of Parallella board. This doughter module should have MLAB compatible design and preferably constructed as separable modules for every Parallella's PEC connectors. 

\sec GPU based computational system 

A new GPU development board NVIDIA K1, shown in the following picture \ref[img-NVIDIA-K1], has recently been released. These boards are intended to be used in fields including computer vision, robotics, medicine, security or automotive industry. They have ideal parameters for signal processing for a relatively low price of 192 USD.  Unfortunately, they are currently only in pre-order release stage (in April 2014). 

\midinsert

\clabel[img-NVIDIA-K1]{NVIDIA Jetson TK1 Development Kit}

\picw=15cm \cinspic ./img/Jetson_TK1_575px.jpg

\caption/f The NVIDIA Jetson TK1 Development Kit \url{https://developer.nvidia.com/jetson-tk1}.

\endinsert