MLABlibrarysvnkaklikMLAB_E8magsvn

Català-Valencià – Catalan中文 – Chinese (Simplified)中文 – Chinese (Traditional)Česky – CzechDansk – DanishNederlands – DutchEnglish – EnglishSuomi – FinnishFrançais – FrenchDeutsch – Germanעברית – Hebrewहिंदी – HindiMagyar – HungarianBahasa Indonesia – IndonesianItaliano – Italian日本語 – Japanese한국어 – KoreanМакедонски – Macedonianमराठी – MarathiNorsk – NorwegianPolski – PolishPortuguês – PortuguesePortuguês – Portuguese (Brazil)Русский – RussianSlovenčina – SlovakSlovenščina – SlovenianEspañol – SpanishSvenska – SwedishTürkçe – TurkishУкраїнська – UkrainianOëzbekcha – Uzbek

Compare Revisions

• This comparison shows the changes necessary to convert path

  → /dokumenty/skolni/diplomka/description.tex @ 1149

  → /dokumenty/skolni/diplomka/description.tex @ 1150

  ↔ Reverse comparison

• Compare Path:	Rev

  With Path:	Rev

Ignore whitespace Rev 1149 → Rev 1150

/dokumenty/skolni/diplomka/description.tex
31,9 → 31,9
\sec Sampling frequency
The sampling frequency is not limited by the technical constrains in the trial version. This parameter is especially limited by the sampling frequencies of the analog-to-digital conversion chips available on the market and interface bandwidth. Combination of the required parameters -- dynamic range requiring at least 16bit and a minimum sampling frequency of 1$\ $MSPS \glos{MSPS}{Mega-Samples Per Second} leads to the need of high end ADC chips which does not support such low sampling frequencies at all. Their minimum sampling frequency is 5$\ $MSPS.
The sampling frequency has not been a limiting factor in the trial version. Generally, the sampling frequency is mostly limited by the sampling frequencies of the analog-to-digital conversion chips available on the market and by the interface bandwidth. The combination of required parameters -- dynamic range needing 16 bits at least and a minimum sampling frequency of 1 Mega-Samples Per Second (MSPS\glos{MSPS}{Mega-Samples Per Second}) -- leads to the need of the high-end ADC chips. However, they do not support such low sampling frequencies at all. Their minimum sampling frequency is 5$\ $MSPS.
We calculated a minimum data bandwidth data rate for eight receivers, 2 bytes per sample and 5$\ $MSPS as $8 \cdot 2 \cdot 5\cdot 10^6 = 80\ $MB/s. Such data rate is at the limit of the actual writing speed of classical HDD \glos{HDD}{Hard disk drive} and it is almost double the real bandwidth of USB 2.0 \glos{USB 2.0}{Universal Serial Bus version 2.0} interface. As a result of these facts we must use faster interface. Faster interface is especially needed in cases where we require faster sampling rates than ADC's minimal 5$\ $MSPS sample rate.
We calculated the minimal data bandwidth data rate for eight receivers, 2~bytes per sample and 5$\ $MSPS as $8 \cdot 2 \cdot 5\cdot 10^6 = 80\ $MB/s. Such data rate is at the limit of the actual writing speed of a classical hard disk drive (HDD\glos{HDD}{Hard disk drive}) and it is almost a double the real bandwidth of USB~2.0\glos{USB 2.0}{Universal Serial Bus version 2.0} interface. As a result of these facts, we must use a faster interface. Such a faster interface is especially needed in cases in which we require faster sampling rates than ADC's minimal 5$\ $MSPS sample rate.
The most perspective interface for use in our type of application is USB 3.0 or PCI Express interface. However, USB 3.0 is a relatively new technology without good development tools currently available. We have used PCI Express \glos{PCI Express}{Peripheral Component Interconnect Express} interface as the simplest and the most reliable solution.
\sec System scalability