| 1 |
\chap Introduction
|
1 |
\chap Introduction
|
| 2 |
|
2 |
|
| 3 |
\sec Current radioastronomy problems
|
3 |
\sec Current radioastronomy problems
|
| 4 |
|
4 |
|
| 5 |
From a radioastronomer's point of view it is important that radioastronomy focuses its interest primarily on natural signals originating in the surrounding universe. It does not pay much attention to the man-made signals created by our civilisation.
|
5 |
From a radioastronomer's point of view it is important that radioastronomy focuses its interest primarily on natural signals originating in the surrounding universe. It does not pay much attention to the man-made signals created by our civilisation.
|
| 6 |
|
6 |
|
| 7 |
However, it is due to these artificial signals, that the current radioastronomy faces a disturbing problem. The problem arises from the fact, that there are so many terrestrial transmitters currently active and all of them are sources of a dense signal mixture which can cause trouble not only to radioastronomers.
|
7 |
However, it is due to these artificial signals, that the current radioastronomy faces a disturbing problem. The problem arises from the fact, that there are so many terrestrial transmitters currently active and all of them are sources of a dense signal mixture which can cause trouble not only to radioastronomers.
|
| 8 |
|
8 |
|
| 9 |
As a consequence, there already exist effort to control the radiofrequency spectrum. As result of attempts to control the radiofrequency spectrum, the frequency allocation table was created. \fnote{\url{http://www.ukaranet.org.uk/basics/frequency_allocation.htm}} Radio-frequency allocation table table contains special bands allocated to radioastronomy use. However, for many reasons these bands are not clean enough to be used directly in radioastronomy observations. As a result, we cannot work in the same way as had the radioastronomers in the very beginnings of radioastronomy. Many experiments, namely Cosmic microwave background detection or pulsar detection, cannot be nowadays realised in their original forms with satisfactory results.
|
9 |
As a consequence, there already exist effort to control the radiofrequency spectrum. As result of attempts to control the radiofrequency spectrum, the frequency allocation table was created. \fnote{\url{http://www.ukaranet.org.uk/basics/frequency_allocation.htm}} Radio-frequency allocation table table contains special bands allocated to radioastronomy use. However, for many reasons these bands are not clean enough to be used directly in radioastronomy observations. As a result, we cannot work in the same way as had the radioastronomers in the very beginnings of radioastronomy. Many experiments, namely Cosmic microwave background detection or pulsar detection, cannot be nowadays realised in their original forms with satisfactory results.
|
| 10 |
|
10 |
|
| 11 |
Supporting evidence of such effect is RadioJOVE project. NASA engineers who originally created the RadioJOVE project had a great idea. The RadioJOVE project brought an opportunity for creating a publicly available, cheap radioastronomy receiver. However, they used an old-fashioned construction design which, on one hand, can operate in harsh environments like deserts, but on the other it simply did not meet the criteria that would make it possible to be used in modern civilisation, as we know it in Europe.
|
11 |
Supporting evidence of such effect is RadioJOVE project. NASA engineers who originally created the RadioJOVE project had a great idea. The RadioJOVE project brought an opportunity for creating a publicly available, cheap radioastronomy receiver. However, they used an old-fashioned construction design which, on one hand, can operate in harsh environments like deserts, but on the other it simply did not meet the criteria that would make it possible to be used in modern civilisation, as we know it in Europe.
|
| 12 |
The source of its dysfunction is a presence of strong radiofrequency interferences. These interferences are orders of magnitude stronger than Jupiter decametric emissions, whose detection was the main aim of the RadioJOVE project.
|
12 |
The source of its dysfunction is a presence of strong radiofrequency interferences. These interferences are orders of magnitude stronger than Jupiter decametric emissions, whose detection was the main aim of the RadioJOVE project.
|
| 13 |
From what we have already seen in the light pollution mitigation pursuit, there is only a small chance to radically improve the situation in radiofrequency spectrum.
|
13 |
From what we have already seen in the light pollution mitigation pursuit, there is only a small chance to radically improve the situation in radiofrequency spectrum.
|
| 14 |
|
14 |
|
| 15 |
The only way to overcome this problem is to search for new methods of radioastronomy observations. New methods which allows us to work without completely clear radiofrequency bands and which allow us to see the surrounding universe even despite the existence of man-made radiofrequency interference mixture. One solution is to use already known natural radio frequency signals parameters. Natural signals usually have different signal properties than local interference. Natural objects do not have problems with transmission in bandwidths of tens of megahertz in sub 100 MHz bands. These objects are usually far away and the same signal could be received at almost half of the Earth globe without any significant differences. On the other hand, it is obvious that signals with such parameters have some drawbacks, namely in the reception power. The reception power of radioastronomical object is 1e9 smaller than signal power received from a typical broadband radio transmitter.
|
15 |
The only way to overcome this problem is to search for new methods of radioastronomy observations. New methods which allows us to work without completely clear radiofrequency bands and which allow us to see the surrounding universe even despite the existence of man-made radiofrequency interference mixture. One solution is to use already known natural radio frequency signals parameters. Natural signals usually have different signal properties than local interference. Natural objects do not have problems with transmission in bandwidths of tens of megahertz in sub 100 MHz bands. These objects are usually far away and the same signal could be received at almost half of the Earth globe without any significant differences. On the other hand, it is obvious that signals with such parameters have some drawbacks, namely in the reception power. The reception power of radioastronomical object is 1e9 smaller than signal power received from a typical broadband radio transmitter.
|
| 16 |
|
16 |
|
| 17 |
From the above mentioned facts concerning the natural radio signals we can conclude that modern requirements imposed on a radioastronomy receiver are completely different from the requirements existing back in the history. Radioastronomy is no longer limited by an access to electronic components, today it is rather limited by the everywhere presence of electronic.
|
17 |
From the above mentioned facts concerning the natural radio signals we can conclude that modern requirements imposed on a radioastronomy receiver are completely different from the requirements existing back in the history. Radioastronomy is no longer limited by an access to electronic components, today it is rather limited by the everywhere presence of electronic.
|
| 18 |
|
18 |
|
| 19 |
\sec Modern Radio astronomy receiver
|
19 |
\sec Modern Radio astronomy receiver
|
| 20 |
|
20 |
|
| 21 |
In the beginnings of radioastronomy, the receivers were constructed as simple stations with single antenna or multi antenna array with fixed phasing. This approach was used because of the existing limits of electronic components and technologies. The main challenges of those times were the problem of noise number and low sensitivity, both present due to the poor characteristics of active electronic components such as transistors and vacuum tubes.
|
21 |
In the beginnings of radioastronomy, the receivers were constructed as simple stations with single antenna or multi antenna array with fixed phasing. This approach was used because of the existing limits of electronic components and technologies. The main challenges of those times were the problem of noise number and low sensitivity, both present due to the poor characteristics of active electronic components such as transistors and vacuum tubes.
|
| 22 |
|
22 |
|
| 23 |
Most of the present-day operating radioastronomy equipment has been constructed in similar manner. It was produced usually shortly after the WWII or during The Cold War as a part of military technology.
|
23 |
Most of the present-day operating radioastronomy equipment has been constructed in similar manner. It was produced usually shortly after the WWII or during The Cold War as a part of military technology.
|
| 24 |
|
24 |
|
| 25 |
Today we have an access to components having quality, repeatability and price completely different from the components accessible by previous generation of radioastronomers. That is why we can develop better radioastronomical equipment, powerful enough to make new astronomical discoveries possible.\fnote{Most of astronomy-related discoveries in the last fifty years came from radioastronomy.}
|
25 |
Today we have an access to components having quality, repeatability and price completely different from the components accessible by previous generation of radioastronomers. That is why we can develop better radioastronomical equipment, powerful enough to make new astronomical discoveries possible.\fnote{Most of astronomy-related discoveries in the last fifty years came from radioastronomy.}
|
| 26 |
|
26 |
|
| 27 |
We have the capacities necessary to develop a receiver which will have wide bandwidth, high Third-order intercept point and preferably an option for phase and frequency locking to other receivers located at another radioastronomical site at Earth. Currently there exist several receivers with the above-mentioned parameters, for example USRP2, USRP B210 or HackRF and all are commercially available. However all of them lack scalability and have high prices. It is exactly the scalability and redundancy that are the main requirements of noise reduction algorithms.
|
27 |
We have the capacities necessary to develop a receiver which will have wide bandwidth, high Third-order intercept point and preferably an option for phase and frequency locking to other receivers located at another radioastronomical site at Earth. Currently there exist several receivers with the above-mentioned parameters, for example USRP2, USRP B210 or HackRF and all are commercially available. However all of them lack scalability and have high prices. It is exactly the scalability and redundancy that are the main requirements of noise reduction algorithms.
|
| 28 |
|
28 |
|
| 29 |
New radio astronomy systems such LOFAR are explicit examples of the scalability and redundancy approach. LOFAR has completely different and novel structure developed to solve the problems of radioastronomy signal reception. It exclusively uses multi antenna arrays and mathematical algorithms for signal handling. Radio signals recorded by LOFAR can be used in multiple ways: radio images can be computed (if sufficient cover of u/v plane is achieved), radiation intensity can be measured, spectrum can be analysed for velocity measurement, etc.
|
29 |
New radio astronomy systems such LOFAR are explicit examples of the scalability and redundancy approach. LOFAR has completely different and novel structure developed to solve the problems of radioastronomy signal reception. It exclusively uses multi antenna arrays and mathematical algorithms for signal handling. Radio signals recorded by LOFAR can be used in multiple ways: radio images can be computed (if sufficient cover of u/v plane is achieved), radiation intensity can be measured, spectrum can be analysed for velocity measurement, etc.
|
| 30 |
|
30 |
|
| 31 |
\secc Observation types
|
31 |
\secc Observation types
|
| 32 |
|
32 |
|
| 33 |
Current radioastronomy knows several types of observations.
|
33 |
Current radioastronomy knows several types of observations.
|
| 34 |
|
34 |
|
| 35 |
\begitems
|
35 |
\begitems
|
| 36 |
* Spectral observations
|
36 |
* Spectral observations
|
| 37 |
* Intensity observations
|
37 |
* Intensity observations
|
| 38 |
* Velocity observations
|
38 |
* Velocity observations
|
| 39 |
\enditems
|
39 |
\enditems
|
| 40 |
|
40 |
|
| 41 |
All of them prefer high frequency resolution and stability. Wide observation bandwidth in hundreds of MHz is usually desirable for easier differentiation of source types.
|
41 |
All of them prefer high frequency resolution and stability. Wide observation bandwidth in hundreds of MHz is usually desirable for easier differentiation of source types.
|
| 42 |
|
42 |
|
| 43 |
\sec Required receiver parameters
|
43 |
\sec Required receiver parameters
|
| 44 |
|
44 |
|
| 45 |
The novel approach of receiver construction described above goes hand-in-hand with new requirements on receiver parameters as well. Currently no additional attempts to improve the signal-to-noise ratio on single antenna are performed. There are however other parameters requested nowadays.
|
45 |
The novel approach of receiver construction described above goes hand-in-hand with new requirements on receiver parameters as well. Currently no additional attempts to improve the signal-to-noise ratio on single antenna are performed. There are however other parameters requested nowadays.
|
| 46 |
|
46 |
|
| 47 |
\secc Sensitivity and noise number
|
47 |
\secc Sensitivity and noise number
|
| 48 |
|
48 |
|
| 49 |
Sensitivity and noise number are parameters that are tied together, but multi antenna and multi-receiver arrays force the price of receiver to be kept at minimal value. This implies that the sensitivity and noise number have to be at least so good in the detection (signal /noise > 1 ) of an observed object, that it would be detected on the majority of receivers connected to an observation network.
|
49 |
Sensitivity and noise number are parameters that are tied together, but multi antenna and multi-receiver arrays force the price of receiver to be kept at minimal value. This implies that the sensitivity and noise number have to be at least so good in the detection (signal /noise > 1 ) of an observed object, that it would be detected on the majority of receivers connected to an observation network.
|
| 50 |
|
50 |
|
| 51 |
\secc Dynamic range
|
51 |
\secc Dynamic range
|
| 52 |
|
52 |
|
| 53 |
Dynamic range represents a huge problem of current radioastronomical receivers. This parameter is enforced by everywhere present humans made EMI radiation on RF frequencies. The modern radio astronomy receiver must not be saturated by this high levels of signals but still needs to have enough sensitivity to see faint signals from natural sources. Dynamic range is limited either by the construction of analogue circuitry in receiver or by the digitalisation unit.
|
53 |
Dynamic range represents a huge problem of current radioastronomical receivers. This parameter is enforced by everywhere present humans made EMI radiation on RF frequencies. The modern radio astronomy receiver must not be saturated by this high levels of signals but still needs to have enough sensitivity to see faint signals from natural sources. Dynamic range is limited either by the construction of analogue circuitry in receiver or by the digitalisation unit.
|
| 54 |
The maximal theoretical dynamic range of ADC could be estimated from ADC bit depth using a following formula \ref[dynamic-range]
|
54 |
The maximal theoretical dynamic range of ADC could be estimated from ADC bit depth using a following formula \ref[dynamic-range]
|
| 55 |
|
55 |
|
| 56 |
%\clabel[dynamic-range]
|
56 |
%\clabel[dynamic-range]
|
| 57 |
$$
|
57 |
$$
|
| 58 |
D.R. (dB) = 20 * log(2^n)
|
58 |
D.R. (dB) = 20 * log(2^n)
|
| 59 |
$$
|
59 |
$$
|
| 60 |
|
60 |
|
| 61 |
The formula \ref[dynamic-range] gives values shown in table below \ref[ADC-dynamic-range].
|
61 |
The formula \ref[dynamic-range] gives values shown in table below \ref[ADC-dynamic-range].
|
| 62 |
|
62 |
|
| 63 |
\midinsert \clabel[ADC-dynamic-range]{Dynamic range versus bit depth}
|
63 |
\midinsert \clabel[ADC-dynamic-range]{Dynamic range versus bit depth}
|
| 64 |
\ctable{cc}{
|
64 |
\ctable{cc}{
|
| 65 |
\hfil ADC Bits & Dynamic range [dB] \cr
|
65 |
\hfil ADC Bits & Dynamic range [dB] \cr
|
| 66 |
8 & 48 \cr
|
66 |
8 & 48 \cr
|
| 67 |
10 & 60 \cr
|
67 |
10 & 60 \cr
|
| 68 |
12 & 72 \cr
|
68 |
12 & 72 \cr
|
| 69 |
14 & 84 \cr
|
69 |
14 & 84 \cr
|
| 70 |
16 & 96 \cr
|
70 |
16 & 96 \cr
|
| 71 |
24 & 144 \cr
|
71 |
24 & 144 \cr
|
| 72 |
}
|
72 |
}
|
| 73 |
\caption/t Standard bit depths of ADC and its theoretical dynamic range.
|
73 |
\caption/t Standard bit depths of ADC and its theoretical dynamic range.
|
| 74 |
\endinsert
|
74 |
\endinsert
|
| 75 |
|
75 |
|
| 76 |
% dopsat cast o minimalnim dynamickem rozsahu ADC.
|
76 |
% dopsat cast o minimalnim dynamickem rozsahu ADC.
|
| 77 |
|
77 |
|
| 78 |
If we look at actual spectrum occupancy in Europe (measured in power spectral density) we see that signal dynamic range in spectra
|
78 |
If we look at actual spectrum occupancy in Europe (measured in power spectral density) we see that signal dynamic range in spectra
|
| 79 |
\url{http://observatory.microsoftspectrum.com}
|
79 |
\url{http://observatory.microsoftspectrum.com}
|
| 80 |
easily reaches 80+ dB above natural noise levels. If we don't want to deal with receiver saturation or poor sensitivity we need a receiver and digitalization unit which has comparable dynamical range of with received signals. This imply use of least 14 bit ADC without any spare of range.
|
80 |
easily reaches 80+ dB above natural noise levels. If we don't want to deal with receiver saturation or poor sensitivity we need a receiver and digitalization unit which has comparable dynamical range of with received signals. This imply use of least 14 bit ADC without any spare of range.
|
| 81 |
|
81 |
|
| 82 |
|
82 |
|
| 83 |
\secc Bandwidth
|
83 |
\secc Bandwidth
|
| 84 |
|
84 |
|
| 85 |
Historically, the parameter of bandwidth in radioastronomical receiver used to be within the kilohertz range. Small bandwidth was acceptable because observations were processed directly by listening or by paper chart intensity recorder. Chart recorder integrated energy of signal over defined small bandwidth which was suitable for detecting the intensity variance of microwave background. No wideband transmitters existed in that era (except for TV transmitters) and tuning to other neighbouring frequency was easy as they were mostly vacant. Parallel observations from several places were unnecessary as well because the electromagnetic conditions were nearly same at all locations.
|
85 |
Historically, the parameter of bandwidth in radioastronomical receiver used to be within the kilohertz range. Small bandwidth was acceptable because observations were processed directly by listening or by paper chart intensity recorder. Chart recorder integrated energy of signal over defined small bandwidth which was suitable for detecting the intensity variance of microwave background. No wide-band transmitters existed in that era (except for TV transmitters) and tuning to other neighbouring frequency was easy as they were mostly vacant. Parallel observations from several places were unnecessary as well because the electromagnetic conditions were nearly same at all locations.
|
| 86 |
|
86 |
|
| 87 |
|
87 |
|
| 88 |
|
88 |
|
| 89 |
\sec Current status of receivers digitalization units
|
89 |
\sec Current status of receivers digitalization units
|
| 90 |
|
90 |
|
| 91 |
% dopsat navaznost na aktualne pouzivane digitalizacni jednotky
|
91 |
% dopsat navaznost na aktualne pouzivane digitalizacni jednotky
|
| 92 |
|
92 |
|
| 93 |
Only few digitalization systems dedicated for radioastronomy currently exists. Currently existing systems uses either custom design of whole receiver or they are constructed from commercially available components. Open-source principle attempts are very rare in radioastronomy field.
|
93 |
Only few digitalization systems dedicated for radioastronomy currently exists. Currently existing systems uses either custom design of whole receiver or they are constructed from commercially available components. Open-source principle attempts are very rare in radioastronomy field.
|
| 94 |
|
94 |
|
| 95 |
\secc Coustom digitalization system
|
95 |
\secc Custom digitalization system
|
| - |
|
96 |
|
| - |
|
97 |
Custom designs usually uses non-recurring engineering for development specific solution for observation project thus costs of this instruments are very high if developed instrument are not reproduced many times. Typical instrument developed in one piece with leads to enormous founding resources draws is Arecibo ALFA survey multi beam feed Array.
|
| - |
|
98 |
Another opposite example for custom receiver and digitalization unit design is LOFAR system developed by Astron in Netherlands. \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3550}
|
| - |
|
99 |
|
| 96 |
|
100 |
|
| 97 |
Coustom designs usually uses non-recurring engineering for development specific solution for observation project thus costs of this instruments are very high if developed instrument are not reproduced many times.
|
- |
|
| 98 |
|
101 |
|
| 99 |
|
102 |
|
| 100 |
The system requires proper handling of huge amounts of data.
|
- |
|
| 101 |
|
103 |
|
| 102 |
Professional astronomers use proprietary digitalization units \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3550} or by multichannel sound cadrd on amateur levels \url{http://fringes.org/}
|
- |
|
| 103 |
|
104 |
|
| 104 |
|
105 |
|
| 105 |
|
106 |
|
| 106 |
|
107 |
|
| 107 |
|
108 |
|
| 108 |
ASTRON ADCs
|
109 |
ASTRON ADCs
|
| 109 |
http://www.astron.nl/other/desp/competences_DesApp.htm
|
110 |
http://www.astron.nl/other/desp/competences_DesApp.htm
|
| 110 |
|
111 |
|
| 111 |
|
112 |
|
| 112 |
\secc Modular digitalization systems
|
113 |
\secc Modular digitalization systems
|
| 113 |
|
114 |
|
| 114 |
|
115 |
|
| 115 |
One modular digitalization system currently exit. It is beaing developed at Berkley
|
116 |
One modular digitalization system currently exit. It is beaing developed at Berkley
|
| 116 |
|
117 |
|
| 117 |
\url{https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/Main_Page}
|
118 |
\url{https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/Main_Page}
|
| 118 |
|
119 |
|
| 119 |
Z-DOK connectors have relatively high pricing around 40 USD http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/6367550-5/6367550-5-ND/2259130
|
120 |
Z-DOK connectors have relatively high pricing around 40 USD http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/6367550-5/6367550-5-ND/2259130
|
| 120 |
This price is comparable with value of one ADC channel in our design described in following part of document.
|
121 |
This price is comparable with value of one ADC channel in our design described in following part of document.
|
| 121 |
|
122 |
|
| 122 |
|
123 |
|
| 123 |
Mudular radioastronomy hardware: https://casper.berkeley.edu/papers/200509URSI.pdf
|
124 |
Mudular radioastronomy hardware: https://casper.berkeley.edu/papers/200509URSI.pdf
|
| 124 |
|
125 |
|
| - |
|
126 |
In opposite of professional astronomers which uses proprietary digitalization units, amateur radioastronomers currently uses multichannel sound cards \url{http://fringes.org/}
|
| - |
|
127 |
|
| - |
|
128 |
It is evident that current radioastronomy lacks of proper hardware which could be used on both communities professionals and amateurs. In addition open-source hardware
|
| - |
|
129 |
|
| - |
|
130 |
|
| 125 |
|
131 |
|
| 126 |
|
132 |
|