Line 1... |
Line 1... |
1 |
\chap Trial version of the receiver, design and implementation
|
1 |
\chap Trial version of the receiver, design and implementation
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
The whole design of radioastronomy receiver digitalization unit is constructed to be used in a wide range of applications and tasks related to digitalization of signal from radioastronomy receivers. A good illustrating problem for its use is a signal digitalisation from multiple antenna arrays.
|
3 |
The whole design of the radioastronomic receiver digitization unit is meant to be used in a wide range of applications and tasks related to digitization of a signal. A good illustrating problem for its use is the signal digitization from multiple antenna arrays.
|
4 |
|
- |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
6 |
\midinsert
|
5 |
\midinsert
|
7 |
\clabel[expected-block-schematic]{Expected system block schematic}
|
6 |
\clabel[expected-block-schematic]{Expected system block schematic}
|
8 |
\picw=\pdfpagewidth \setbox0=\hbox{\inspic ./img/Coherent_UHF_SDR_receiver.png }
|
7 |
\picw=\pdfpagewidth \setbox0=\hbox{\inspic ./img/Coherent_UHF_SDR_receiver.png }
|
9 |
\par\nobreak \vskip\wd0 \vskip-\ht0
|
8 |
\par\nobreak \vskip\wd0 \vskip-\ht0
|
Line 11... |
Line 10... |
11 |
\caption/f Expected realisation of signal digitalisation unit.
|
10 |
\caption/f Expected realisation of signal digitalisation unit.
|
12 |
\endinsert
|
11 |
\endinsert
|
13 |
|
12 |
|
14 |
\sec Required parameters
|
13 |
\sec Required parameters
|
15 |
|
14 |
|
16 |
We require the following technical parameters, to supersede existing digitalization units solutions.
|
- |
|
17 |
Primarily, we need wide a dynamical range and high IP3. \glos{IP3}{Third-order intercept point} The receiver must accept wide dynamic signals because a typical radioastronomical signal has a form of a weak signal covered by a strong man-made noise or other undesired noises as lighting, Sun emissions etc.
|
15 |
We require the following technical parameters in order to overcome the existing digitization units solutions. Primarily, we need a wide a dynamical range and a high third-order intercept point (IP3\glos{IP3}{Third-order intercept point}). The receiver must accept signals with the wide dynamics because a typical radioastronomical signal is a weak signal covered by a strong man-made noise or other undesired noises as lighting, Sun emissions, etc.
|
18 |
|
- |
|
19 |
Summary of other additional required parameters follows
|
- |
|
20 |
|
16 |
|
- |
|
17 |
\medskip
|
- |
|
18 |
\noindent
|
- |
|
19 |
The summary of other additional required parameters:
|
- |
|
20 |
%
|
21 |
\begitems
|
21 |
\begitems
|
22 |
* Dynamical range better than 80 dB, see section \ref[dynamic-range-theory] for explanation
|
22 |
* Dynamic range better than 80 dB, see section \ref[dynamic-range-theory] for the explanation.
|
23 |
* Phase stability between channels
|
23 |
* Phase stability between channels.
|
24 |
* Low noise (all types)
|
24 |
* Low noise (all types).
|
25 |
* Sampling jitter better than 100 metres
|
25 |
* Sampling jitter better than 100 metres.
|
26 |
* Support for any number of receivers in the range of 1 to 8
|
26 |
* Support for any number of receivers in the range of 1 to 8.
|
27 |
\enditems
|
27 |
\enditems
|
28 |
|
28 |
|
- |
|
29 |
\noindent
|
29 |
Now we analyze several of the parameters in detail.
|
30 |
We analyze several of the parameters more in detail in the sequel.
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
31 |
\sec Sampling frequency
|
32 |
\sec Sampling frequency
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
33 |
Sampling frequency is not limited by the technical constrains in the trial version. This parameter is especially limited by the sampling frequencies of analog-to-digital conversion chips available on the market and interface bandwidth. Combination of the required parameters -- dynamic range requiring at least 16bit and a minimum sampling frequency of 1$\ $MSPS \glos{MSPS}{Mega-Samples Per Second} leads to the need of high end ADC chips which does not support such low sampling frequencies at all. Their minimum sampling frequency is 5$\ $MSPS.
|
34 |
The sampling frequency is not limited by the technical constrains in the trial version. This parameter is especially limited by the sampling frequencies of the analog-to-digital conversion chips available on the market and interface bandwidth. Combination of the required parameters -- dynamic range requiring at least 16bit and a minimum sampling frequency of 1$\ $MSPS \glos{MSPS}{Mega-Samples Per Second} leads to the need of high end ADC chips which does not support such low sampling frequencies at all. Their minimum sampling frequency is 5$\ $MSPS.
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
35 |
We calculated a minimum data bandwidth data rate for eight receivers, 2 bytes per sample and 5$\ $MSPS as $8 \cdot 2 \cdot 5\cdot 10^6 = 80\ $MB/s. Such data rate is at the limit of the actual writing speed of classical HDD \glos{HDD}{Hard disk drive} and it is almost double the real bandwidth of USB 2.0 \glos{USB 2.0}{Universal Serial Bus version 2.0} interface. As a result of these facts we must use faster interface. Faster interface is especially needed in cases where we require faster sampling rates than ADC's minimal 5$\ $MSPS sample rate.
|
36 |
We calculated a minimum data bandwidth data rate for eight receivers, 2 bytes per sample and 5$\ $MSPS as $8 \cdot 2 \cdot 5\cdot 10^6 = 80\ $MB/s. Such data rate is at the limit of the actual writing speed of classical HDD \glos{HDD}{Hard disk drive} and it is almost double the real bandwidth of USB 2.0 \glos{USB 2.0}{Universal Serial Bus version 2.0} interface. As a result of these facts we must use faster interface. Faster interface is especially needed in cases where we require faster sampling rates than ADC's minimal 5$\ $MSPS sample rate.
|
36 |
The most perspective interface for use in our type of application is USB 3.0 or PCI Express interface. However, USB 3.0 is a relatively new technology without good development tools currently available. We have used PCI Express \glos{PCI Express}{Peripheral Component Interconnect Express} interface as the simplest and the most reliable solution.
|
37 |
The most perspective interface for use in our type of application is USB 3.0 or PCI Express interface. However, USB 3.0 is a relatively new technology without good development tools currently available. We have used PCI Express \glos{PCI Express}{Peripheral Component Interconnect Express} interface as the simplest and the most reliable solution.
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
38 |
\sec System scalability
|
39 |
\sec System scalability
|
Line 67... |
Line 68... |
67 |
The GPSDO device consists of Si570 chip with LVPECL output. Phase jitter of GPSDO \glos{GPSDO}{GPS disciplined oscillator} is determined mainly by Si570 phase noise. Parameters of the Si570 are summarized in the following table \ref[LO-noise] (source \cite[si570-chip] ).
|
68 |
The GPSDO device consists of Si570 chip with LVPECL output. Phase jitter of GPSDO \glos{GPSDO}{GPS disciplined oscillator} is determined mainly by Si570 phase noise. Parameters of the Si570 are summarized in the following table \ref[LO-noise] (source \cite[si570-chip] ).
|
68 |
|
69 |
|
69 |
The GPSDO design, that is included in data acquisition system, has special feature -- it generates time marks for a precise time-stamping of the received signal. Timestamps are created by disabling the local oscillator's outputs, connected to SDRX01B receivers, for 100 us. As result, a rectangular click in the ADC input signal is created which appears as a horizontal line in spectrogram.
|
70 |
The GPSDO design, that is included in data acquisition system, has special feature -- it generates time marks for a precise time-stamping of the received signal. Timestamps are created by disabling the local oscillator's outputs, connected to SDRX01B receivers, for 100 us. As result, a rectangular click in the ADC input signal is created which appears as a horizontal line in spectrogram.
|
70 |
Timestamps should be seen in image \ref[meteor-reflection] (above and below the meteor reflection).
|
71 |
Timestamps should be seen in image \ref[meteor-reflection] (above and below the meteor reflection).
|
71 |
|
72 |
|
72 |
Time-marking should be improved in future by digitalization of GPS signal received by antenna on observational station. Following that, the GPS signal can be directly sampled by a dedicated receiver and one separate ADC module. Datafile then consists of samples from channels of radio-astronomy receivers along with the GPS signal containing precise time information.
|
73 |
Time-marking should be improved in future by digitization of GPS signal received by antenna on observational station. Following that, the GPS signal can be directly sampled by a dedicated receiver and one separate ADC module. Datafile then consists of samples from channels of radio-astronomy receivers along with the GPS signal containing precise time information.
|
73 |
|
74 |
|
74 |
|
75 |
|
75 |
\midinsert \clabel[LO-noise]{Phase noise of the local oscillator}
|
76 |
\midinsert \clabel[LO-noise]{Phase noise of the local oscillator}
|
76 |
\ctable{lcc}{
|
77 |
\ctable{lcc}{
|
77 |
& \multispan2 \hfil Phase Noise [dBc/Hz] \hfil \cr
|
78 |
& \multispan2 \hfil Phase Noise [dBc/Hz] \hfil \cr
|